Today, I stumbled upon a worthwhile interview with Brian Storm, the president of MediaStorm, in Nieman Reports.
MediaStorm creates multimedia documentaries for news organizations like National Geographic, MSNBC, Slate and Reuters. They take on serious social issues like the war in the Democratic Republic of Congo, families facing economic hardship in the rural Midwest, and posttraumatic stress of American soliders in Iraq.
Here are few unique things about MediaStorm’s approach:
- The Web site doesn’t have an editorial focus other than to do quality social documentary storytelling.
- Although the company’s roots are in traditional journalism, its focus is on “advocacy, not just information.”
- It’s clients also include NGOs (Council on Foreign Relations) and for-profit companies (Starbucks).
- The stories aren’t published on a set schedule or deadline, but when “a project is ready.”
- The features are long for the Web (20 minutes or more), but most people who start watching a segment finish it.
- They do not advertise in traditional ways, but rely on word of mouth and social networking.
Here are a couple of sections of Melissa Ludtke’s interview with Brian Storm that I found especially compelling.
Brian Storm on the state of the news industry:
For years I’ve been saying it’s time for us to take journalism back. To take it out of the business development role and back into the world of why we got into journalism in the first place. We have to remember back to the time when we decided, “I want to be a journalist.” Why did we want to be a journalist? Did we wake up one day and say, “I want to make a pile of money?” I don’t think any of us did that. That’s not what drives us. We’re curious and want to learn about the world. It’s an incredible gift to enter into someone’s life and tell their story.
On digital access:
The crowd has access to these great digital cameras, to this incredible powerful publishing tool called the Web, and they have expanded the conversation. They have access to distribution that we, as professional journalists, have. This doesn’t make me fearful; it makes me excited. That’s democracy—to have more people, more input, and more access to different perspectives.
On the stories journalists should be doing:
Why are we, as professional journalists, allocating our resources for such daily, perishable stories? We should be allocating them for things that are in-depth, investigative and require the kind of expertise and professionalism that we have. We need to take a deep breath and remember all the things that we used to do, then reconsider given the new landscape and decide what is going to give us the most value over time. What is the role that we need to play? I don’t believe that is day-to-day, perishable content. I think we need to be more in-depth, more investigative, and more robust in what we do. I know that over time, that will actually pay off.
